过错推定原则 meaning in English
doctrine of presumption
Examples
- Through analysing the basic theories and reasons , gathering and reviewing the related law and regulations , discussing the disputed problem of the liability for tort , the author of this thesis reach conclusions as follows : it is the origin of law that embodies the professional responsibility of cpa in view of the legal liability of auditing . as far as the civil liability for tort of cpa ` s negligent act to practice is concerned , the subject of liability relates directly to the organization form of the accounting firms . whether liability for breach of contract or for tort that cpa should be taken against customers depends on the reason of sue which the customers choice
在界定与注册会计师执业过失行为相关的民事侵权责任时,责任主体与会计师事务所组织形式有直接关系;责任主体对客户的责任:若以违约诉之则应承担违约责任,若以侵权诉之则应承担侵权责任;选择已知第三人原则作为确定第三人范围的标准;主张以过错推定原则作为注册会计师执业过失行为民事侵权责任的归责原则;确定构成要件时,应当将违法行为包含在过错要件之中,即构成要件包括:损害事实、行为与损害事实之间的因果关系、行为人的过错。 - Based on the comparison and analysis of the theories and practices of professional liability of both domestic and abroad , this thesis analyses the definition , characters and catalog of “ professional ” , the scope of “ third party ” and focuses on the doctrine of “ assumption of fault ” , the identification of “ negligence ” and “ the causation relation ” in a professional ’ s tort by negligence . this thesis also discusses how to reasonably limit the professional ’ s liability taking the high risk of the profession into account and proposes the professional liability insurance
通过比较分析国内外的理论和实践,本文论述了专家的概念、特征和分类,第三人的范围;并重点论述了“专家过失”侵权时适用的过错推定原则,以及对专家“过失” 、 “因果关系”的具体认定;鉴于专家行业的高风险性,文章还对如何合理限制其责任进行了探讨,主要论述了专家责任保险制度。 - On the basis of the illustration of the origin , basic condition , connotation and historical mission of kinds of liability fixation , referring to the series viewpoints of applying liability fixation of infringing intellectual property both domestic and abroad , the paper does comparative research on fault liability fixation , presumed - fault liability fixation and non - fault liability fixation , and realized that liability fixation is merely the liability fixation of tortuous compensation liability
在阐述了侵权法各归责原则的由来、基本情况、内涵和历史使命的基础上，参照国内以及国外对知识产权侵权适用的归责原则的系列观点，文章对过错责任原则、过错推定原则和无过错责任原则做了对比研究，认识到归责原则只是侵权赔偿责任的归责原则。 - The ca should take the liability of tort when the relying party suffers for its negligence . the onus of proof should be on the ca as it is a professional organization . also , as the ca runs a high risk , it is necessary to put a reasonable limitation on its liability
通过比较借鉴专家对第三人的民事责任制度,笔者认为认证机构和信赖方之间没有合同关系,二者间是一种“信赖关系” ;在认证机构因过失对信赖方造成损失时,认证机构应承担侵权责任;因为认证机构的专业性,故应适用过错推定原则;又因为认证机构的高风险性,故还应对其责任进行合理限制。 - Return trademark infringement indemnity return the matter of principle of , this text from fault predict outcome principle is a very much the principle of , the fault predicts outcome the principle in the aspects of the special function of the trademark infringement indemnity realm a few ly detailed argument the trademark infringement indemnity returns the principle - fault predicts outcome the principle
对于商标侵权损害赔偿的归责原则问题，本文从过错推定原则是一独立的归责原则，过错推定原则在商标侵权损害赔偿领域的独特作用几个方面详细论证了商标侵权损害赔偿的归责原则?过错推定原则。