死刑案件 meaning in English
death penalty case
death sentence case
Examples
- Besides , they argue that once a mistake is made , the innocent will be punished , which is the breach of the principle that punishment can only be executed on the one who commits the crime . this article will elaborates the necessity of death penalty ’ exist from the perspective of retribution . the first chapter will explain what is retribution , retribution ’ taking shape course and the meanings of retribution in contemporary age
与此相对应,死刑废除主义论者认为死刑并不是实现报应的必要手段,主张以其他刑罚方法也可以实现报应的要求;并且认为死刑案件一旦误判,就会刑及无辜,进而违背了刑罚只能施用于犯罪人本身这一条由报应论导出的刑罚规制。 - Abstract : this thesis discussed how to limit the death penalty and guarantee its quality from the perspective of procedure which includes 3 questions : first , there have several issues need to be solved for the second public hearing trial ; second , it ' s not enough to take the death penalty review power back from the high court to the supreme court ; third , it ' s so necessary to strengthen defense in the death penalty cases
内容提要：本文从三个方面讨论了如何从程序上限制死刑、保证死刑案件的质量，分析了落实死刑案件二审开庭所要解决的问题，指出应利用死刑复核收回这一机会完善相关制度，并提出加强死刑案件辩护的若干建议。 - At the same time , as the legislation on this procedural system is too simple , and without any contents , ways and time limit of judicial review , especially without any right of defense of the accused during the proceedings for revision , which leads to the procedure similar to the administrative examination and approval system and without any lawsuit color , so as to interfere with the pursuit of the procedure to the value of justice during the
同时，由于立法在该程序制度规定上过于简单，对复核内容、方法、期限均未做出规定，尤其是未规定被告人在复核程序中的辩护权，从而使这一程序近似行政审批制度而鲜有诉讼色彩，更加影响了该程序在死刑案件裁判中对公正价值的追求。当前，死刑复核程序中许多制度性变革被提上议事日程，人们开始重新思考这一程序的性质和存在价值等问题。