窝藏赃物 meaning in Chinese
harbour stolen goods
Examples
- Crime of concealing the booty
窝藏赃物罪 - First of all , robbery is defined as an illegal act of possessing owners ’ property with violence , threats , or other illegal methods . the transforming crime refers to the crime of an executor when or after carrying out an act of one crime , his act has met constitute of another crime due to the appearance of certain special fact or element
我国《刑法》第二百六十九条规定: “犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪,为窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证而当场使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁的,依照本法第二百六十三条的规定定罪处罚。 ” - Article 269 whoever commits the crime of theft , fraud or forcible seizure of money or property and uses violence on the spot or threatens to use violence in order to conceal the booty , resist arrest or destroy the criminal evidence shall be convicted and punished in accordance with the provisions of article 263 of this law
第二百六十九条犯盗窃、诈骗、抢夺罪，为窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕或者毁灭罪证而当场使用暴力或者以暴力相威胁的，依照本法第二百六十三条的规定定罪处罚。 - This paper compares the legal regulations concerning the applicable conditions and the recognition of the crime and proposes : ( 1 ) the prerequisites should be extended to include the acts of robbery . snatch , and deception ; ( 2 ) the " violence " as an objective condition should be interpreted as the violent and forcing actions in robbery , while " on site " should be the site of the stealing , deception , or snatch , or the area involved in the crime with the site as the center ; ( 3 ) the connotation of the subjective condition " harboring the stolen goods , resisting an - eat , destroying criminal evidence " needs expansion ; ( 4 ) dual criteria should be adopted emphasizing on both the act and the consequence in distinguishing the completed crime and the criminal attempt ; and ( 5 ) in case of overlap of law and imaginary concurrence of crimes only by convicting the crime as theft , snatch , and deception can it be regarded as transformed robbery
本文通过比较不同国家该罪的有关法律规定，对我国转化型抢劫罪的适用条件及法律认定问题进行分析，认为： ( 1 )前提条件应扩展为实施盗窃、抢夺、诈骗行为； ( 2 )客观条件中“暴力”应与抢劫罪中的暴力与胁迫行为作同样理解， “当场”应是实施盗窃、诈骗、抢夺行为的当场或以犯罪现场为中心、与犯罪分子活动有关的范围； ( 3 )主观条件中“窝藏赃物、抗拒抓捕、毁灭罪证”的内涵应有所延伸； ( 4 )既遂与未遂的判定应采用既主张行为又注意结果的双重标准； ( 5 )在想象竞合或法条竞合时只有以盗窃、抢夺、诈骗罪论处方可转化为抢劫罪。