种类物 meaning in Chinese
genus indefinite thing
genus; indefinite thing
Examples
- The text of this paper discusses the crime objects of embezzlement from four aspects : chapter i : provisions of ancient and modem criminal law to embezzlement crime . this part introduce the provisions regarding embezzlement crime in chinese past dynasties , putting focus on investigating the provisions regarding crime objects of embezzlement . the earliest provisions about embezzlement in china appeared in the warring states , and oin dynasty had some relevant rules . while tang dynasty , which stood at the height of power and splendor for political and economic development in feudalism society , prescribed more detailed embezzlement crime and gave a definite classification to the crime objectives . the objectives of crime stipulated in tang dynasty law consist of commissioned property , loaned property , lost property and hidden property generally
笔者认为,不动产可以成为侵占罪对象;对于种类物能否成为侵占罪的犯罪对象应该具体分析;无形物可以成为侵占罪对象;知识产品不能成为侵占罪的对象;违禁物和赃物不宜成为侵占罪的犯罪对象。 “遗忘物”和“遗失物”二者不能等同,遗失物不是侵占罪的犯罪对象,埋藏物既包括私人所有的埋藏物,也包括属于国家或集体所有的埋藏物。文章在最后指出,应用“遗失物”取代“遗忘物” ;应将脱离他人持有的财物作为侵占罪的犯罪对象。 - The article introduced thoroughly the different theories carried out by domestic lawful circle to the object of this crime and introduced alternatively the related abroad theories . on this basis , the author adopted the matters of analogy to point out that the objects including natural property and lawful property and expounded it deeply , therefore , form a new knowledge to the object of this crime . in the first part , the author discussed systematically the definition , characteristics , standard and classification of the object in embezzlement crime , and introduced emphatically one of the characteristics of the object ? the characteristic of “ other ’ s property ” and the academia ’ s two perspectives : “ the subordinate doctrine ” and “ the independent doctrine ”
本文采用分类类比的方法,在对侵占罪犯罪对象基础理论全面分析的基础上,介绍了世界其他国家对侵占罪的犯罪对象的不同认识,将侵占罪的犯罪对象分为自然属性和法律属性两大部分并做了具体阐述,主要对种类物、违禁品、赃物、遗忘物、埋藏物等作为侵占罪犯罪对象的各种财物在认定犯罪时所涉及的问题进行了深入地阐述,厘清了侵占罪与盗窃罪的界限,分析了侵占行为与不当得利行为的区别。