确定损害赔偿 meaning in Chinese
assess the damages
Examples
- This article first introduces environmental value , its category and assessment of environmental value ; then environmental policy , environmental compensation of usa , and cercla , opa ’ 90 will be introduced . also , rules on assessment of environmental damage contemplated in directions issued by euro parliament and eu council of ministers and their developments will be explored . demonstrative analysis , comparative analysis and etc . will be applied in the research of the above law , and meanwhile , theory of environmental economics will be adopted in assessment of environmental damage
本文首先是通过环境的价值及其分类和评价环境价值的各种方法的介绍,让大家对环境的价值有初步的认识;再通过对美国的环境对策、补偿、责任法( cercla ) 、油污法( opa ’ 90 )和欧洲议会及欧盟部长理事会关于环境损害的预防和救济的指令案中关于对自然环境资源的损害评价规则和发展过程进行分析探讨,综合运用实证分析、比较分析等方法来研究上述法律运用环境经济学原理来确定损害赔偿额的评价方法。 - Thus there are two areas of concern : firstly , although criminal prosecutions or administrative means have already been carried out , the infringement has occurred and the interests of the obligee has been violated . without setting definite areas of indemnification due to the infringement , the interests of the obligee cannot be assured and on the other hand , it can not prevent further torts . secondly , in evaluating the indemnification of the torts , there is no standard or scope which can cause difficulty in judicial judgment , especially in the evaluation of the intangible injury or the injury which cannot be enumerated , and in the evaluation of the evidence that causes injury
在过去多年的司法实践表明，单凭刑事和行政手段，未必能完全保护知识产权权利人之利益，这里有两个方面思考：第一，即使作出了刑事和行政手段，有关的侵害行为可能已经作出，并导致权利人利益受损，在没有规范侵权人需要为侵权行为所承担的赔偿范围，一方面未能保障权利人之利益，另一方面也未能产生阻吓作用，提升预防功能；第二，对侵权行为进行损害赔偿计算时，并没有统一标准和范围，对于司法审判造成一定难度，尤其是对于非财产损害之计算、造成损失之举证和无法列明之损失各个方面，也使法官在确定损害赔偿金额时，需要考虑和注意的问题。