替代责任 meaning in Chinese
vicarious liability
Examples
- On vicarious liability of employers in dispatching labor
劳动派遣关系中的雇主替代责任研究 - There are provisions of the liability of employer in anglo - american law system and continental law system . these provisions are applied to the employers whose employees do some damage to a third party during working hours . the sphere of the application has been expending all the time in practice
用人者责任与英美法的替代责任和大陆法的雇主责任是意义相当的概念,是用人者对被用人在履行职务行为时致第三人损害承担责任的法律制度。 - In usa , although the legislation has adopted parallel models of vicarious liability and doctrine of identification , in judicial practice especially in the federal court the vicarious liability model dominates . further to that the us judicial practice has been very responsive to the latest theory and seeks to consider the internal independent mind of corporate crime and misconduct
美国在立法上虽已形成替代责任与同一原则并存的格局，但在司法上特别是联邦法院主要的依据仍然是替代责任；法院一直致力于扩展替代责任的范围，并在司法实践中继续采纳新的法人刑事责任理论，试图撇开实施犯罪行为的自然人，直接考虑法人内在的独立犯罪意志，以求扩大法人的刑事责任。 - After reviewing the traditional theories of vicarious liability and doctrine of identification in common law countries , it describes and reviews in details the latest development in this field such as the aggregation doctrine model , the reactive corporate fault model , corporate mens rea doctrine model , the management failure model and the model of self - identity
第一节介绍与评析了普通法系国家的法人刑事责任理论。在系统梳理了传统的替代责任与同一原则理论，以及晚近出现的集合原则、法人反应原则、法人犯意原则以及法人自身特性原则等法人刑事责任的新理论之后，本文对新旧理论作了一一评述。 - But because the legal person is a social organization composed of staff member in different posts ( including legal person organ , manager , employee , agent and subcontractor , etc . ) , and has consistent management system , which complicates the settlement of the damages caused by its torts . so the first triggering questions are as follows : what kind of damages and whose tort should be assumed by which way by the legal person , and then what is the character of the liability
本文认为,雇主责任属于替代责任的范畴,不能作为法人对无法归咎于个人行为的侵权损害承担责任的理论基础,该制度中法人因对其雇员已尽注意义务和监督义务而免责的规定也不具有现实意义,所以我国未来民法典应赋予法人以侵权行为能力,它解决的问题涵盖法人对其机关及其他工作人员因执行职务而致他人损害的责任承担。