控制说 meaning in Chinese
cybernetic theory
Examples
- Pound advanced the theory of “ social control through law ” from this new opinions on purpose of law
从新的法律目的学说出发,庞德提出了“社会控制说” 。 - Listening is so different from speaking , reading and writing that it is impossible for the listener to manipulate the speech speed of the speaker and the language the speaker will use , and to anticipate what speakler will say
听不同于说、读、写、听的人不能控制说的速度，也不能控制对方使用的语言，对听的内容也不能预先估计。 - The first part poses the importance of studying perpetrator , for the virtues of not only grasping the diversities of acts of every criminal , but also providing the theoretical base for solving all kinds of cases of indirect perpetrator and accomplice perpetrator
文章的第二部分主要研究正犯之概念。过往之刑法理论，有实质客观说、主观说、形式客观说、折衷说、控制说等诸多观点。 - This paper spreads out through expounding the background and starting point of pound ' s sociological jurisprudence , his representative and creative theory , “ social control through law ” and “ social engineering theory ” . and it depicts its long and deep historical influence and unique academic contribution
本文从庞德的社会学法学思想产生的时代背景和理论出发点、最具代表性学说和创新性的学说, “社会控制说”和“社会工程说”几个方面展开,勾勒了其深远的历史影响和独特的学术贡献。 - Points out that the liability of danger is not the sanction to violations of law . the basic idea of the liability of danger lies in " the reasonable distribution of unlucky damages " . the main reasons are : ( 1 ) the doctrine of origin of danger , i . e . the owner or holder of enterprise , instrument , < | > r article assume the liability because they create the danger ; ( 2 ) doctrine of control of danger , i . e . the enterprise assumes the liability for it ? controls the danger in certain extent ; ( 3 ) doctrine of " enjoying benefit , assuming liability " , i . e . the owner or holder of enterprise , instrument , or article assume the liability because they enjoy the benefit ; ( 4 ) doctrine of allocation of losses , i . e . the damages occurred from the liability of danger should be dissipated through the price mechanism of commodity service and insurance system
Esser )在其名著《危险责任之基础与发展》 ( 1941年)一书中指出，危险责任不是对不法行为的制裁，危险责任的根本思想在于“不幸损害的合理分配” ，主要根据在于： ( 1 )危险来源说，即因为企业、物品或装置的所有人或持有人制造了危险来源，因而应承担责任； ( 2 )危险控制说，即企业在某种程度能控制这些危险，因此应负责任； ( 3 )享受利益负担危险说，即企业、物品或装置的所有人或持有人从其企业、装置或物品中获得利益，故理所当然应当负担风险； ( 4 )损失分摊说，因危险责任而生的损害赔偿，得经由商品服务的价格机能和保险制度予以分散。