公平解决 meaning in Chinese
equitable settlement
fair settlement
Examples
- China stands for seeking fair solution of the differences through negotiation on the basis of the unclos
对于有关分歧，中方主张应根据《联合国海洋法公约》 ，通过谈判求得公平解决。 - The author considers the legal system of intellectual property right is opening so that the domain name should be included as a kind of independent right . in the following parts of the essay , the author explores the fundamental causes of conflict and re - classifies the types of conflict between domain name and trademark , reanalyzes the similarity and the difference between domain name and trademark , makes comparison between the three major domain name dispute resolutions that have already been provided ( udrp , acpa and the domain name disputes solution of china ) , it can provide ground for an effective method for solution . at last , the thesis baldly points out that it should stand an independent legal status in ip law
故，笔者欲突破在商标及商标法框架下研究域名的思维定势，重新审视域名法律地位、分析其法律属性;以域名与商标冲突为典型，研究导致冲突的原因;从平等中立的角度，以贯穿经典案例的方法重新划分冲突分类:以横向比较分析的研究方法评介全球具有代表性的冲突解决方案和我国新的域名政策以及司法解释，为正确提出解决方案建立基础;探讨域名争议解决的主要原则，分析域名在我国的立法模式;最后，笔者将在全文分析的基础上，尝试提出域名权利问题，以期能从根本上寻求解决域名的法律保护以及冲突的公平解决的合理机制。 - The latter is a theoretical innovation , it criticizes the given model in chinese securities market in which only get the csrc ' s affirmation of iniuria firstly can you claim for damages . then go to the causation , with several european countries as background , the author initially supposes we should adopt the " scope of the rule " theory to solve the causation problem of the liability on manipulations , thereof simplifying the abstract and complex speculation over the causation , merely by thinking through the scope and attempt of law can we judge itfinally , in dealing with damage measure , different from the prevailing method by which scholars often choose one way from three alternatives , those are " out - of - pocket " measure , " defendant ' s profit " measure and " plaintiff ' s loss " measure , the author advises a new appoach that fundamentally applying the first measure and supplementary applying the two measures else , it is expected to fairly settle the puzzling problem in damage measure
在因果关系部分，本文以主要欧洲国家的因果法理为背景，开创性地提出采用法规目的说解决操纵市场行为责任范围因果关系的问题，使抽象的因果推定回归到仅依法规目的与意义考察的单纯境界。最后在损害结果部分，与学界通常在“直接损失衡量法” 、 “被告获利计算法”以及“原告损失计算法”中三选一的思维定式不同，提出以直接损失衡量法为原则并辅之以其余二者的折衷解决方案，以期公平解决损害结果在计算上的难题。