上级法院 meaning in Chinese
higher court
superior court
Examples
- The higher court affirmed the lower court's decision .
上级法院维持下级法院的判决。 - The appeal system , which is the system where the superior court reviews the judgment made by the subordinate court that has n ' t taken effect upon the claim of the appellant , has become one of the basic litigation systems around the world to achieve the judicial justice
上诉审是指上级法院对下级法院已作裁判、尚未生效的案件，根据上诉人的上诉，再行审理的一种制度。基于裁判公正这一基本价值目标而设立的上诉审制度已经成为世界各国的一项基本诉讼制度。 - In china , adjudicator de jure includes only judges and people ' s assessors who undertaking criminal trials . in practice , those who do not undertake criminal trials , including the administrators within a people ' s court , the judges of superior courts , party leaders , members of people ' s congress , even practitioners of the mass media , become adjudicators de facto
在我国，法定的裁判者只有负责个案审判的法官和人民陪审员，而在实践中，不负责个案审判的人，包括法院内部行政领导、上级法院领导和法官、党的领导干部、人大代表、新闻媒体从业人员，都在一定程度上对案件行使着实质上的裁判权。 - Finally , delivery of cargo without original bills of lading promote the development of shipping in a way in practice , it has reasonability in existence . chapter three is writer ' s study for 10 leading cases of chinese maritime court and court of cassation concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading , writer conclude as follows : chinese courts are inclined to regard it as breach of contract but not in tort in judicial practice ; chinese courts allow the plaintiff to choose to sue in tort or of breach ; chinese courts have abandoned the viewpoint of " who holder the bills who must have the right to sue " or " who holder the bills who must win the case " ; and in many cases concerning delivery of cargo without original bills of lading , the court ignored plaintiff ' s actions against the carrier , it proved that carrier can escape reasonability of delivery of cargo without original bills of lading in some cases
第三章论述我国海事法院及其上级法院就无单放货案件审理的司法审判实践研究，通过对十个法院判例的分析、归纳，笔者认为，在司法实践中，法院越来越倾向于将无单放货纠纷视为运输合同纠纷处理，而不认定为侵权行为纠纷；法院允许原告起诉时以侵权起诉或违约起诉作出选择；法院对提单持有人的诉权认定，已经不采用“谁持有提单谁就有诉权”与“谁持有提单就能保证胜诉”的观点；有诸多的无单放货的诉讼案例以被法院驳回起诉为结局，证明了无单放货在特定情况下的合理性以及承运人有避免承担责任的可能性。