法定情节 meaning in English
statutory circumstances
Examples
- The following steps may be effective : take into account all the details related to a crime including the circumstances for discretion without regard to the concrete legal circumstances presumably ; decide abstractly the standard of punishment which should be applied to the crime ; examine the legal circumstances and adjust the said criterion
刑法规定的法定量刑情节需要一个参照基准，应在假定不考虑犯罪人的具体法定量刑情节的基础上，考虑犯罪人所有的与犯罪有关的全部犯罪细节包括酌定情节，抽象地确定这一犯罪应当适用的基准刑罚，再在此基础上，考虑量刑的法定情节，对基准刑罚进行适当的调整。 - The criminal law of p . r . c stipulated that the legal circumstances includes the circumstances of crime and the sentencing discretion , whether as the circumstances of crime or sentencing discretion , there are some barriers in the theory and practice of the " robbery of housebreaking " , because the criminal law of our country has no specific rules about the aggravate crime or the aggravate circumstance
我国刑法规定的法定情节包括犯罪情节和量刑情节两种， “入户抢劫”作为犯罪情节或者量刑情节都存在理论和实践上的障碍，因为我国刑法并无加重构成罪或者加重量刑情节的具体规定。 - According to the principle of " the synthetic distribution of punishment " , the author poses the concept of " the circumstance of distribution of punishment " , and taking the error making method , compares the " robbery of housebreaking " with there circumstances : the criminate , the sentencing , and the distribution of punishment , it is conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " should not be regarded as the circumstances of crime or the sentencing discretion , even though there are some barriers in the theory conclusions as a circumstance of distribution of punishment , so we can conclude that the " robbery of housebreaking " can not be considered as the legal circumstances , it must be the circumstance of distribution of punishment even if it is regarded as the legal circumstances . in the process of jurist and legislation , we must strictly grasp the approval standards of the " house " , recognize and deploy the legal sentence of " robbery of housebreaking " correctly ,
根据“统一配刑论”的原理，笔者提出了“配刑情节”的概念，并采取归谬法，将“入户抢劫”同时置于定罪、量刑、配刑三种语境下进行比较，得出“入户抢劫”既不应该是犯罪情节，也不可能是量刑情节，作为配刑情节也存在理论障碍的结论，进一步推断出“入户抢劫”不应该作为法定情节，即使作为法定情节也应该是配刑情节的结论，而且在司法和立法中应从严把握“户”的认定标准，正确认识和配置“入户抢劫”的法定刑，防止罪刑失衡，还对具体案件和审判实践中要解决的几个问题提供了参考方案。