归纳命题 meaning in English

inductive proposition

Historically , a cornerstone of classical empiricism has been the notion that every true generalization must be confirmable by specific observations
历史上，经典经验论立基于此一观念之上：每个真实的归纳命题必须能被个别观察所证实。
In classical empiricism , the truth of “ all balls are red , ” for example , is assessed by inspecting balls ; any observation of a non red ball refutes unequivocally the proposed generalization
在经典经验论中，诸如“所有的球都是红色”这类命题的真实性都通过对球的观察而受到评判。所观察到的任何一个非红色球都会毫不含糊地否定曾经提出的归纳命题。
In that case , he argues , any statement or combination of statements ( not merely the “ offending ” generalization , as in classical empiricism ) can be altered to achieve the fundamental requirement , a system free of contradictions , even if , in some cases , the alteration consists of labeling the new observation a “ hallucination
在那种情况下，任何陈述或陈述组合（它们并非如经典经验论所断言的那样，只是与归纳命题“相抵触” ）都会被更改以满足基本的要求? ?使系统能自圆其说，即使有时候给新观察打上“幻觉”的标签也在所不惜。