存疑判决 meaning in English
open verdict
Examples
- Under the 1996 amendment of the criminal procedure act , principles of presumption of innocence and in dubio pro reo have been established
随着1996年刑诉法的修改,疑罪从无原则已经在我国法律中确立,而与此不相协调的是大量的存疑判决案件不断冲击着人们的对司法的信任。 - However , verdicts of guilt with reasonable doubt , which can not be satisfied by the standard of criminal proof , still exists in the process of judicial practice , which definitely brings about some negative impacts
遗憾的是,相当数量存疑案件的存在并没有引起学界对存疑判决本身应有的关注,学界的焦点几乎集中在刑讯逼供、超期羁押等问题上,认为这些才是产生一切冤假错案的根源。 - Though detailed study of the standard of criminal proof helps to reduce the rate of these verdicts , it cannot resolve the problem in all because of the unavoidable shortcomings of the standard of proof . finally , the author advocates that precedent system should be established to accumulate judicial experience on rules of discerning ‘ doubts ’ . meanwhile , the author strives to figure out primary rules of discerning ‘ doubts ’ from the misjudged cases
笔者认为建立证明标准案例指导制度,积累司法经验,尤其是总结排疑规则才是消解存疑判决现象的根本之道,笔者在对案例指导制度建立的必要性与可行性进行分析论证的基础上,提出规范案例指导制度的一些设想,并根据有限的错案对排疑规则的建立进行了初步的探索。 - Unfortunately , while scholars in the area mainly focus on problems including extorting a confession by torture , taking into custody beyond the time limit and many other criminal issues relating to these cases , little attention has been paid to the phenomenon of verdicts of guilt with reasonable doubt itself
问题是,疑罪从无原则在刑诉法中确立已近10年,几乎没有法官不知道疑罪应当从无,而司法实践中疑罪仍然从无难,疑错案的纠正更是难上加难。这使笔者觉得有对存疑判决现象本身有深入研究的必要。 - This dissertation is devoted to a systematic study of the phenomenon of verdicts of guilt with reasonable doubts by a comprehensive methodology including case , historical research , statistical research and comparative research etc . the article explores the essential features of such verdicts from typical case . next , point out that ‘ intermediary verdict theory ’ is the fundamental justifications for verdicts of guilt with reasonable doubts . then , concludes that a verdict with reasonable doubts is due to the de facto low standard of criminal proof
笔者以实践中大量的存疑案件为研究起点,综合运用个案分析法、历史方法、统计方法和比较方法,总结出存疑判决的基本特点,并对存疑判决现象的思想基础及该现象与无罪推定原则的关系进行了分析,指出产生存疑判决现象的原因在于实际证明标准过低,认为细化证明标准的研究应该是消解存疑判决现象的可行之道。